DR. SIMONCINI - CANCER IS A FUNGUS
After decades of medical reports that there is 'no cure for cancer'; how do we begin to tell the world the truth about cancer? And how does one doctor who has found a natural cure with a 100% survival rate in his cancer patients, overcome what the media and medical reports have presented to us through paid for 'scientific studies'? As millions continue to die of cancer, could there be more to the truth about a cure for cancer than we realise?
For about 100 years, the fundamental theory behind cancer has been based on the hypothesis that cancer is a malfunctioning of the genes. This point of view implies that cancer is intracellular meaning very little can be done to cure it.
Dr. Simoncini's years of research has shown however that cancer is a fungus and is associated most commonly with the fungal infection - candida albicans. If cancer is a fungal infection, it is therefore an extra cellular phenomenon (outside of the body's cells) and most importantly of all, it is more treatable than medical doctors claim.
Dr. Simoncini's book 'Cancer is a fungus' describes how 'a fungal infection and systemic fungi (such as candida albicans) always form the basis of every neoplastic formation in the body (i.e. new, invasive growth formations), and this formation tries to spread throughout the body without stopping. We all know that cancer spreads through the body without stopping.
The growth of these fungal colonies and the reaction of the tissue that tries to defend itself against the invasion is what actually causes the formation of tumours (much like pustules or cysts etc. that form pockets of independent growths as they fight infections or abnormal cell growth). The exception is that tumours can become huge in the body because cancer is extremely aggressive and as the body tries to contain these growths from the rest of the body, lumps or tumors form.
Cancerous growths and tumours are always white. In over 20 years of research, Dr. Simonicini has found that there is only one cause of cancer: Candida albicans, which, according to the anatomical branch concerned causes different histological reactions. 'This is the reason why there are so many types of tumours'.
At the moment, sodium bicarbonate (in a solution of 5% or 8.4%) is the only remedy capable of making the tumours disappear completely - more than chemotherapy. In order to get the maximum effect, the sodium bicarbonate has to be brought into direct contact with the tissue. Dr. Simonicini does this by introducing a special catheter into the arteries that reach different organs, or by using conventional endoscopic methods.'| For twenty years, Dr Simoncini has employed the use of sodium bicarbonate to treat his cancer patients and every one of them have survived with the cancer disappearing
because it is killed at the root and ... because it is a fungus, once
it is entirely destroyed from the body it does not come back. If cancer is intracellular as doctors claim - that is, it develops inside the cell due to genetic cellular dysfunction, how is it possible that his patients have been cured of every kind of cancer with sodium bicarbonate? - an anti fungal substance?. More importantly, why has the medical industry turned their backs on such a successful therapy? - that is - if saving the lives of cancer patients are doctors' main concern as they claim and they are being successfully treated with a natural substance that is 100% successful - why haven't they embraced Dr. Simoncini's success? |
Furthermore - why is it that every time a successful treatment is discovered by a medical doctor that does not employ the use of prescriptive drugs and medical technology but natural treatments, the medical industry revokes a doctor's medical licence - if he refuses to abandon that form of treatment?
Success should mean such doctors should receive accolades - not be banned from practising medicine. That is - if saving lives is the main objective of cancer treatments and cancer research - or is it?
Medical doctors are bound to use medical drugs and technology to treat all health conditions. If no drug is capable of successfully treating a condition like Alzheimer's disease or cancer, the medical industry claims 'there is no cure' for that condition. They then continue years of 'research' as millions buy into the myth that there really is no cure.
With the help of the media, the fact that cures are already available outside of finding a medical drug to cure cancer, is also suppressed. What is amazing is that successful cures for cancer have been discovered by medically trained doctors who have then been threatened to 'drop it' or lose their medical licence.
The success of these natural treatments makes no difference to the medical industry as billions and billions of dollars are heaped into 'medical research' to find a 'cure'. Cancer research is one of the most costly programs in the history of medical research. Decades go by - if not almost a century now; billions upon billions continue to pour into reaearch for cancer and yet, the cure is still yet to be found according to the medical industry. What on earth could be taking so long? How could cancer be such a great mystery? The truth is cancer isn't a mystery at all but as long as those who know that cancer can be cured - simply and inexpensively - continue to threaten the status quo with the truth about cancer, they will always be suppressed and discredited in the public eye.
Once again - the question must be asked, when a cure exists that is not drug based and has an extremely high success rate - and has no side effects as do chemotherapy and other treatments - why does the medical industry not promote the fact that cancer can be cured?
Is the motive of 'cancer research' to save lives or to have a preference for drug based treatments that are highly profitable to the industry?
Before we continue with what happened to Dr. Simoncini when he discovered a cure for cancer which is still extremely successful today, let us look at what happened to another doctor who discovered a natural cure for cancer almost forty years ago. Why have we never heard of this amazing doctor? Why is cancer still the number one killer and why do people so blindly go along with anything doctors and the media tell them? The sad truth is most people die from cancer with medical treatments - perhaps if we learn more about natural cures we can make a more informed decision about treatments.
Does a cure for cancer have to be a drug or involve medical technology? What about thousands of cancer patients who cured their condition with an anti cancer diet? Why is no attention paid to such successful alternative remedies?
Isn't it ridiculous that doctors continue to tell the public ' we don't know what cancer is'? In addition, by now saying cancer is genetic or its in your genes, they are saying there isn't very much that can be done to prevent it. But that is one eighth of the story for those who may have a cancerous gene - cancer is mostly stimulated or forced into development by the way a person eats and lives.
They know that putting these half truths 'out there' psychologically seals the fate of millions who will not seek the available numerous ways to prevent and reverse cancer. Nothing is more disturbing than to see the world in a hypnotic trance repeating the words 'there is no cure for cancer'.
Photo of a liver riddled with cancer which is white in colour. During his research, Dr. Simoncini noted that cancer tumours are always white in color. These tumours also have the properties, colour and texture of fungal growths in the body, particularly candida albicans.
 Photo of liver riddled with cancerous tumours This is secondary cancer in the liver. The cancer in this photo started in the pancreas and then spread to the liver seen here. Dr. Simonicini has had a almost 100% success rate in treating these growths with sodium bicarbonate. Successful treatment with chemotherapy and medical drugs is less than 40%. Dr. Simonicini states that cancer is always white as it is a fungus. But how can one doctor who has found the truth and is so successful override decades of indoctrination that there is no cure for cancer? Knowledge is power. Always eat an anti-cancer diet. Learn more about candida albicans as doctors do NOT test people for this fungal infection and worse yet they do NOT treat people who have it. Many people who have fungal infections througout their lives are prescribed medications to treat only the symptoms. That it, if a person has an oral fungal infection or vaginal infection, doctors will treat the fungus in those affected areas WITHOUT going to the root cause of the infection. This means millions of people are living with candida overgrowth without even knowing it. Love chocolate? crave sweets? It could be candida. The more you know about your body, the healthier you will be (please read the article on candida which is the fungus that causes cancer). |
 Fungal Growth of Candida Albicans (fungal infection) in the stomach - which is medically known to cause
cancer A fungal infection such as this is generally left unterated because doctors do not treat systemic candida albicans. This is what grows into cancer. Dr Simoncini's states that cancer itself is the candida fungus
while medical studies only go as far as to state that infections cause cancer. Pathogens, toxins and infections are a cause of cancer. Other causes are environmental factors and mutations possibly caused by radiation and other factors etc. Note the extreme likeness of candida albicans to cancer. This is due to the fact that candida albicans and cancer are one and the same. Further research notes that cancer responds (literally stops growing and shrinks into non existence from direct contact of sodium bicarbonate - a primary anti fungal substance. |
NEXT > 1954: Dr. Evangelos Danopoulos discovers urea as a natural and successful treatment for cancer. The medical industry bans him from practicing medicine despite the phenomenally high survival rates of his patients. Success without the controlled use of drugs for profit means there is still 'no cure' for cancer. When will this end? >>